Bmw e46 m3 Vs Mitsubishi evo 7

Comments on 'Bmw e46 m3 Vs Mitsubishi evo 7'

1. hahahahahaha fucking launch this shit.. //M 3 kidked your
   ass
2. OWNED!
3. u fucken suck fuck the evo my bmw m6 will smoke ur shit
   hahahahahah
4. hahahahahah "is it awd"??? faggot ass kids in that evo
5. that is AWD and the thing about stock EVOs it that they have
   huge turbos that kick in once enough is built up
6. Evo driver sucks balls
7. M POWER
8. Sure 70 hp difference is "very little" in the real world...
   DUH? Who cares how quick street cars are around the track,
   its not like you actually race with them. Track day
   performance is useless.
9. "is that awd or rear?" lmao this guy is a faggot
10. lol, but none of your family sedans or wagons will touch an
    M3 round a track. Also, there is very little difference
    between to E92 and the E46 M3, in the real world. On paper
    the E92 is the faster car. Ive driven both, and prefer the
    E46's rawness compared to the more refined E92. The E46 M3
    in the right hands is an awesome car.
11. BMW > Mitsubishi
12. because evo is cheaper.
13. @DCJodon I never said its common. I just sais many makes
    have luxury sedans and wagons with way more power than your
    M3. Maybe you should supercharge it if you want to go fast,
    i walk all over stock M3s here every weekend because they
    are so common. E90 M3s are completely another story then...
    those things are actually quick..
14. @3312cdfp5674 In more slippery conditions and high power
    applications AWD has huge advantage. On dry tarmac tho you
    are right it doesnt have much purpose after launch. Usually
    on the street from red lights etc on slippery road tires it
    has very useful advantage, and its WAY easier to launch
    quickly.
15. that ladies and genlteman is why you buy an m3 instead of a
    piece of shit evo is cause mitsubishi is a shit car company
16. is it jus me or is it like evo suck at the line compared to
    subi cuz ive seen civic rape evo frumt he line but wen it
    come to subi the subi eats them alive idk it is jus me or
    does ne 1 agree wid me?
17. no AWD is best for traction, like a start of a race.
    afterwards the AWD has no purpose
18. i know the make AWD but its not fun unless you can drift it
    and BMW is not know for their AWD
19. @ivbeenshot Get a clue fanboi. BMW also makes AWD, and
    AWD>RWD.
20. @Grodinz bmw AWD? ummm no RWD FTW
21. that was luck ahahahaha....silly ricers and the 4 bangers
22. Please elaborate.... Are you telling me its common for a
    luxury, daily driven, sedan is pushing as much power as a
    Nissan GT-R R35? Also, another good piece of info for ya...
    BMW M3 E46 = production from 2001 - 2006. Again, where are
    you getting your info from? Based on my basic education, the
    1990's and 2000's are two different decades. So next time
    you want to call my "90s" M3 lousy, I suggest you put some
    decent info into your head before making a comment as dumb
    as the one you just made.
23. @DCJodon Yeah, it is. Maybe somebody in 1990 was thinkin
    its fast but hello its 2010 and any decent make has models
    from 4 door luxury cars to station wagons with up to 500-600
    horses stock. So if you roll in some lousy M3 from 90s, too
    bad.
24. loser....................dude asian skill better than you
    guys should come and watch it,if i were you,i bang the evo
    to treee
25. i think he was talking about the e46 M3.. and not the 335xi
    that is currently in sale right now... so in actuality he is
    correct..